The difference between Google and Facebook
There is a lot discussion going on about Facebooks new Open Graph features and the way the company tries to take over the web. While Facebook's attempt to connect any website with the social graph of its 400+ million active users is both innovative and superior to any other similar initiative, the centralization of the web with Facebook as the central point and the social networks ignorance of core principles of privacy has led to a lot of criticism.
Comparisons between Facebook and Google - the other big web company with a dominating role in the current web world - are inevitable. Even Google gathers as much data as possible about its users and even Google tries to be everywhere, to be the heart that powers the web. Nevertheless there are many differences between both companies, and I want to point out the one that in my eyes is most crucial and that lays the basis for how I judge the way the two services act: Google at least tries not be evil. It might not always work, but still, if you follow the companies activities, you will see that this is more than an empty phrase. And Facebook? Well, Facebook doesn't claim not to be evil, and considering how they act (e.g. hiding the logout button), I don't feel that they are investing any energy in at least trying not be. For me, it's not so much about what they do, how successful they do it and what their goals are (earning money, and that's understandable), but HOW they do it and how honest they are. I think that this is where Facebook fails. And that's a problem.
Comments [2]